Beth Dow
Standard, Little Moreton Hall by Beth Dow
3 Trees, Blenheim Palace by Beth Dow
Mrs. Deane posted the lovely work of Beth Dow which looks so luscious and otherworldly, I can hardly stand it. (It also makes me think of the topiary maze from The Shining. I’m so pedestrian I know.)
I’d love to see these prints in person… I’m sure that much is lost in the translation to .jpg. The two images above are from her In the Garden series. The ones below are from her Fieldwork series which she recently exhibited at Franklin Artworks in Minneapolis.
Beth was a McKnight Fellow in 2004, putting her in the very fine company of many photographers I know and love.
Two Holes by Beth Dow
Broken Tree by Beth Dow
About this entry
You’re currently reading “Beth Dow,” an entry on Personism
- Published:
- 09.09.07 / 10pm
- Category:
- Photography, Web
- Older:
- Links: Paddy has Answers, Alec has Questions
- Newer:
- 20×200 is here!
September 10th, 2007 at 6:58 am
That first shot is beyond perfect. Thank you for sharing.
September 11th, 2007 at 1:29 am
It was a happy discovery for me - I’ve been thinking about this work a lot since I saw it last night.
September 11th, 2007 at 11:10 am
Thanks for pointing to these wonderful images, they are very inspiring. Its like looking into another world, through a looking glass maybe…
September 13th, 2007 at 2:35 pm
I met the lovely Ms. Dow in Santa Fe a couple of years ago, and you are right - in person her prints are luscious and something to behold. If I remember correctly she has married very well: to her master printer. Smart and talented!
September 16th, 2007 at 9:18 am
I agree, the first photo is totally fascinating, I’m not quite sure why
October 11th, 2007 at 1:31 am
[...] ago, I was introduced to the work of Beth Dow via Mrs. Deane. About a week after I said here that I’d love to see the prints in person, a slim sturdy masonite sandwich arrived via FedEx. As expected, the photos inside were stunning [...]
July 12th, 2008 at 1:59 am
Be sure to compare Beth’s work with Lynn Geesaman’s. The two approach similar subjects with very different results; it’s instructive to look at them both (and don’t forget Sally Gall in this arena, also).