I am getting really weary of beating this drum. Tokion sent an email blast last night announcing their speaker line-up for the 4th Edition of their Creativity Now Conference. Below is their announcement with a couple of small edits from me:
This unique symposium will bring together top figures men in art, design, fashion, photography, film, new media, publishing and marketing. In the same room for the first time, thepeople men shaping today's popular culture will spend two days exchanging their ideas, methods and inspirations before an audience of 2,000.
Who knew it was so damn hard to find creative women to speak on panels? It must be a huge challenge because they have nineteen speakers and three moderators and there's not a woman among them. No female screenwriters or magazine designers or street artists or brand strategists. Nope, they are impossible to find.

hi jen,
we've been getting this comment a lot...
for the record, women invited who turned us down/were unavailable include:
yoko ono
cindy sherman
sofia coppola
sam taylor wood
nikki s lee
cecilia dean
nicole phelps
hope atherton
miranda july
dana schutz
valerie faris
amy larocca
elizabeth peyton
vivienne westwood
luella bartley
stella mccartney
lance still
sally mann
cecily brown
swoon
and plenty more i can't think of off the top of my head...
as for "who knew it was so damn hard?" well, as that list shows, it ISN'T hard coming up with talented women working in art, design, fashion, photography, film, new media, publishing and marketing.
but the speakers list you see reflects the reality of who was willing/available to confirm for the conference. however, it's flattering to think that we give the impression that we have so much control over the creative community's colllective schedule that we get to pick and choose our speaker list without outside considerations. we'll take that as a compliment!
Posted by: ken | 10/03/2006 at 08:00 PM
I appreciate Ken taking the time to respond, but I have to say that the justification doesn't hold water. It's not enough to try - think of an inversion, impossible as it may be. What if you asked a bunch of people and it turned out that the roster were comprised exclusively as women? Aside from the fact that it would've never happened that way, it's unlikely that such a roster would be presented to the public.
It's not acceptable. Perhaps you need to ask twice as many women as you intitally asked. Perhaps when an invited speaker replies "no" you need to ask them to refer you to other women. Or perhaps you could have presented the issue to the panelists who accepted the invitation - I'm sure that they know some women who would be a fine addition to your schedule. It's not too late.
Posted by: Jen Bekman | 10/05/2006 at 08:00 PM
So, Jen, you're asking that twice as many women should be invited; if a woman turns down the invitation, more work should be done in asking for a recomendation for only women... now there's some equality for you... oh wait, no it's not...
Posted by: jen | 12/12/2006 at 07:00 PM
At the point that I wrote about this, the conference roster was 100% male.
I doubt that as many women as men were asked to begin with, and I also doubt that twice as many women would need to be asked in order to come up with at least a few women, and yea, I think that if that's what needed to be done, it should've been done.
What do you propose as a solution?
Also, for future reference, the List of Women Speakers is a good place to start research into potential presenters.
Posted by: Jen Bekman | 12/12/2006 at 07:00 PM
WORST INTERPOL ALBUM COVER!
FIRE THE DESIGNER!!!!
http://www.pitchforkmedia.com/article/news/43615-album-art-cop-interpol-vs-ola-podrida
http://www.pitchforkmedia.com/page/news/47174-interpol-kosheen-artwork-more-than-coincidence
http://sleevage.com/interpol-our-love-to-admire/
Posted by: Kim Horst | 04/07/2008 at 08:00 PM